Morning Wire XX
[0] A new report from the Small Business Administration estimates that billions of dollars in COVID relief funds have been given to fraudsters since 2020.
[1] This is undoubtedly the largest public fraud crisis we've ever seen.
[2] How has the SBA explained the estimation and can the money be recovered?
[3] I'm Georgia Howe with Daily Wire Editor -in -Chief John Bickley.
[4] It's Thursday, June 29th, and this is Morning Wire.
[5] A House subcommittee is accusing the Biden administration of censoring the online speech of Americans with the help of big tech covering their tracks.
[6] It has gone so far beyond its original mission set of cybersecurity.
[7] Now they're focused on misinformation and becoming the arbiters of so -called truth.
[8] And New York City seeks to slice emissions from pizzerias that use coal and woodfire ovens.
[9] Give us pizza.
[10] Well, give us death.
[11] Why is New York's pizza community so strongly opposed?
[12] Thanks for waking up with Morning Wire.
[13] Stay tuned.
[14] We have the news you need to know.
[15] A new report estimates that a stunning $200 billion in COVID relief funds and grants were distributed to potential fraudsters since 2020.
[16] Here to discuss is Daily Wire reporter Amanda Presta Giacomo.
[17] Hey Amanda.
[18] So we've known about large -scale COVID fraud for years now, but this estimate is the largest we've seen to date.
[19] Break down these new numbers out of the Small Business Administration.
[20] Yeah, sure thing.
[21] A report from the SBA office of the Inspector General found that $200 billion in COVID relief was given to potential fraudulent actors between March of 2020.
[22] That's when Congress passed the CARES Act in January of 2022.
[23] This is from two relief programs, the Paycheck Protection Program, widely known as PPP, and the Economic Injury Disaster Loan, an estimated $64 billion, was stolen from PPP and $136 billion from the Economic Injury Disaster Loan Program.
[24] In total, $1 .2 trillion tax dollars were distributed for these programs, so nearly one -fifth of all that money was given to fraudsters.
[25] Now, fraud experts say that you can generally expect about 5 % of fraud in any organization.
[26] This is estimated at more than triple that at about 17%.
[27] Yeah, so significantly higher here.
[28] Now, this isn't the total estimated COVID fraud, correct?
[29] Yeah, that's right.
[30] This report from the SBA focused in on money given specifically to small businesses.
[31] To that point, here's Bob Westbrook, former executive director of the Federal Pandemic Response Accountability Committee, speaking to News Nation.
[32] So the 200 billion they were reported here, keep in mind, that's just four programs from the Small Business Administration.
[33] There were 426 federal programs that distributed pandemic relief aid.
[34] The other program that was hit and hit hard and hit in all 50 states was the unemployment insurance program.
[35] We saw fraud from the very beginning from overseas.
[36] Well, $200 billion could be a lowball estimate of total COVID fraud.
[37] So how did this happen?
[38] I think we can expect some government incompetence, but these numbers are pretty eye -opening.
[39] Yeah, certainly.
[40] I mean, the SBA for its part, it's basically denying the estimate from the IG's office.
[41] They're saying that $200 billion estimate is way too high.
[42] They say it's likely around $36 billion, you know, still nothing to sneeze at.
[43] The SBA also emphasized that 86 % of likely fraud happened in the first nine months of these programs.
[44] I think the implication is that the urgency of the pandemic contributed to the fraud.
[45] The IG's report seemed to blame the relaxation of safeguards due to the pressing strain of the pandemic as well.
[46] The report said that the allure of, quote, easy money attracted an overwhelming number of fraudsters.
[47] Republican Texas Representative Roger Williams, he's the chairman of the House Committee on Small Business.
[48] He criticized the SBA for failing to implement, quote, basic guardrails to protect the integrity of these programs.
[49] Yeah, it appears to be the case.
[50] So do we know any specifics about the sort of scams that were pulled off by these fraudsters?
[51] Yeah, we certainly have some insight there.
[52] The report outlined a number of different cases.
[53] Oftentimes, fraudulent are stolen employee identification numbers were used for grants or loans.
[54] There were scams pulled off with phony email addresses.
[55] There was one person who scammed the SBA more than 150 times to the tune of millions of dollars.
[56] Wow.
[57] And a man living in California was able to scam enough money from PPP that he splurged on three different cars that cost six figures each.
[58] I'll note that reports have suggested for years now that some of this fraud was committed by foreigners.
[59] Tens of billions of COVID relief dollars have been connected to international scam artists.
[60] So where do we stand now on recovery of all this taxpayer money?
[61] So far, some $30 billion has been recovered.
[62] There have been over 1 ,000 indictments, 800 arrests, and there are currently 570 investigations ongoing.
[63] But most of the losses have been deemed unrecoverable.
[64] It's a lot of taxpayer money to lose.
[65] Amanda, thanks for reporting.
[66] Thanks for having me. The U .S. Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the federal government said in a new report released on Monday that an agency within the Biden administration's Department of Homeland Security conspired with big tech to censor American online speech.
[67] Joining us to discuss is Daily Wire reporter Brandon Dre.
[68] So Brandon, we've covered this purported government big tech collusion, in particular the so -called industrial censorship complex that was coined by the Twitter files reporters.
[69] Now this House subcommittee is essentially corroborating that reporting.
[70] What's the latest?
[71] Hey Georgia, correct.
[72] It's more proof of what some Americans have possibly thought was happening, but couldn't totally prove, except now we can.
[73] So the committee obtained non -public documents from the cybersecurity and infrastructure security agency, or SISA for short, which revealed that officials within the agency considered creating a so -called anti -misinformation rapid response team, but instead outsource a censorship operation to a third -party non -government organization that they funded.
[74] But the lawmakers said that the most damning portion of this report was that the agency scrubbed any proof of surveillance or censorship activities from its website.
[75] So pretty alarming.
[76] When did all of this happen and what type of information did the agency target?
[77] Well, SISA was initially created in 2018 by the Trump administration to focus on protecting critical infrastructure and countering cybersecurity threats.
[78] But it began to quote, routinely target American speech on social media and the run -up to the 2020 election and into the midterm elections, last year.
[79] They mainly censored information surrounding voter fraud or other election -related issues and content related to the pandemic.
[80] Now, shortly after President Biden took office, his administration reportedly transitioned the agency to focus more on targeting domestic sources.
[81] So in response, SISA formed a since -dispanded team specifically designed to weed out what they believe is, quote, miss, dis, and mal -information.
[82] Now, the administration funded with taxpayer dollars, third -party intermediaries, who essentially, received social media posts funneled by the government through these portals that were accused of spreading what they considered dis or misinformation.
[83] According to the report, the team wanted to use a government -funded nonprofit to serve as its mouthpiece to, quote, avoid the appearance of government propaganda.
[84] And has the government and or SISA responded?
[85] Yeah, so I reached out to them and they denied the report as patently false saying Sisa does not and has never censored speech or facilitated censorship.
[86] So what's next here?
[87] Is there going to be any oversight or changes made to this organization?
[88] So it seems like the name of the game these days is there's a lot of talk and no action.
[89] Here's Florida Congresswoman Kat Kamik, a member of the subcommittee on Fox News.
[90] This is the industrial censorship complex at work.
[91] When you have an agency that's rapidly morphed into something that is so unconstitutional, it's our duty to basically dismantle it.
[92] All right.
[93] Well, definitely something we're going to continue to report on.
[94] Brandon, thanks for coming on.
[95] Thank you for having me. The New York City Department of Environmental Protection has drafted new rules requiring some pizza places using wood and coal fire ovens to reduce their carbon emissions by 75%, a measure that many fear could shut them down.
[96] Here to discuss is Daily Wire contributor and New York City pizza connoisseur, David Marcus.
[97] So first we've got to talk about this flying pizza protest against this new policy that went viral.
[98] What exactly happened there?
[99] Morning.
[100] So Scott Labato is a New York -based conservative artist known for his viral videos, but this one was next level.
[101] After a short speech about the absurdity of all but banning Wood and Coal Oven Pizza, he declared that this was the New York Pizza Party, referring to the Boston Tea Party, and then proceeded to throw slices of pizza over a fence at City Hall while chanting, give us pizza or give us death.
[102] And that might sound like hyperbole to some, but not to New Yorkers.
[103] The piesta restance was the fact that he got a ticket for doing it.
[104] This, while people openly do drugs on the subway or illegally splash about naked in fountains at pride, it really just summed up what people feel is broken about the city perfectly.
[105] Now, this is not an outright ban, but owners of these restaurants, including some of the city's most famous, say that the expense of meeting the requirement could actually shut them down.
[106] Why would this be so costly?
[107] What's the nature of that expense?
[108] Yeah, so, I mean, they need to install air purifference.
[109] systems that start at about $20 ,000 a pop and then also pay to maintain those systems, which isn't cheap.
[110] This at a time when supply chains and inflations have made running any restaurant much more expensive, not to mention the lingering effects of lockdowns and the fact that fewer people are going to work in person.
[111] The fear is that this is an economic straw that could break the camels back.
[112] Here's what Republican City Councilman Joe Borrelli had to say.
[113] People are upset for a number of reasons, not the least of which, is that this will have absolutely no impact on actual carbon emissions.
[114] The city's use of diesel engines in their own fleet is up by 300%.
[115] But here we have the Department of Environmental Protection going after, you know, fat Tony and its pizzeria.
[116] It's just absurd.
[117] And this is not just going to be limited to pizzerias.
[118] This is going to include the jerkstand, the matto -o oven, the barbecue pits, the Parisians.
[119] I mean, anything that requires really an open flame with a solid fuel source, is going to be impacted.
[120] People are frustrated.
[121] They see a city with real problems, and to hear that this is a concern coming at a city hall, it's just absurd.
[122] Food is one of those things that does two things, actually.
[123] It unites culture within their own group.
[124] It really solidifies the relationship between people of an ethnic group, and it also allows us to experience the cultural diversity of this city.
[125] So when you go after food and restaurants, it really is a kick in the shin to most New Yorkers.
[126] Now, this only affects a small percentage of the overall pizza scene in New York.
[127] Why are people so up in arms?
[128] Well, there's a hierarchy to New York pizza.
[129] At the bottom is the dollar slice, though inflation now has that at 150.
[130] Then there's the regular neighborhood joint.
[131] Those use the long, shiny gas ovens that you see in mafia movies when they, like, shove the guy's head into it.
[132] And finally, there's the high -end places like Johns of Bleaker or Grimaldives.
[133] These are the ones using wood and coal, and they're legendary.
[134] It's a past time in the city to argue over which one is the best.
[135] And so people look at this as just another thing being taken away from them by an overzealous state.
[136] And not for nothing.
[137] People see this and say, why is it always the affordable luxuries of the middle class being denied in order to save the planet while John Kerry and Leonardo DiCaprio are flying on private jets?
[138] Seems like a valid question.
[139] This also follows right on the heels of New York banning future gas stove.
[140] So there's lots of people already sort of sensitive on this.
[141] This plan is only a draft so far, though.
[142] So could we see New York EPA reverse the decision, given the outrage, it's already created?
[143] I definitely think that's possible, but that doesn't address what many see as the deeper problem of creeping regulation.
[144] This was a very squeaky wheel.
[145] Threatening a New Yorker's pizza is like threatening a New Englander's arrogance.
[146] It's going to get noticed.
[147] There are many measures along these lines that the public never really finds out.
[148] out about at least until it's too late.
[149] Yeah, so much of maintaining good public policy is just simply awareness.
[150] Dave, thanks for joining us.
[151] Thanks for having me. That's all the time we've got this morning.
[152] Thanks for waking up with us.
[153] We'll be back later this afternoon with more news you need to know.