Morning Wire XX
[0] A new study suggests that wearing masks made little to no difference in preventing the spread of COVID -19.
[1] There are still a few people in public health and in medicine that pushed these idea that masks could protect people.
[2] And this Cochrane meta -analysis calls them out.
[3] We look at the parameters and why this study in particular stands out.
[4] I'm Georgia Howe with Daily Wire editor -in -chief John Bickley.
[5] It's February 11th, and this is your Saturday edition of Morning Wire.
[6] A leaked FBI memo shows that the Bureau was considering targeting what it called radical traditional Catholics.
[7] Why did the Bureau consider the group a threat and how is it responding to the backlash?
[8] And the forever sought after middle seats in movie theaters are set to rise in price at certain theater chains.
[9] If you're looking to curb costs, you might sit off to the side or even closer to the screen itself.
[10] We break down the cost and the controversy.
[11] Thanks for waking up with Morning Wire.
[12] Stay tuned.
[13] We have the news you need to know.
[14] Do you love MorningWire?
[15] Well, you can shop the collection at DailyWire .com slash shop.
[16] Start today with your favorite podcast and coffee from your very own Morning Wire mug.
[17] Or rep the news you need to know with MorningWire t -shirts, hoodies, and towpags.
[18] That's DailyWire .com slash shop.
[19] A new study by one of the most well -regarded medical review organizations in the world finds that masks are largely ineffective at stopping the spread of flu and COVID.
[20] Daily Wire Culture reporter, Megan Basham, joins us now to give us the details of this study.
[21] So, Megan, there's been a lot of competing studies on mass, seeming to show different results.
[22] What is significant about this new report?
[23] Well, the big difference here is that it comes from the International Research Collaborative, the Cochran Review, and that's based in Great Britain.
[24] And its publications are widely considered some of the most reliable in the world due to the fact that it does these systematic reviews of all of the sound data available.
[25] And what that means is it performs studies of studies and then offers comprehensive analysis.
[26] So Stanford professor of health policy, Dr. J. Batacharya, told me Cochran is considered the gold standard within the medical community.
[27] It covers basically every single important randomized trial on community masking going back decades.
[28] And the way that Cochran conducts reviews is very systematic.
[29] And the idea is to assess each study on the quality of the evidence provided by the study with preference given to randomize evidence because that is the study methodology that reduces bias the most.
[30] So for this meta -analysis, more than 12 medical experts reviewed 78 randomized control trials, and that included hundreds of thousands of participants all around the globe.
[31] All right, so a comprehensive review of dozens of studies, what did it find?
[32] Well, you know, I'll let Dr. Bottacharya have the reveal on that.
[33] They found that when they focus on the highest quality evidence, there is no support for the idea.
[34] The community masking suppresses the spread of highly infectious respiratory viruses, including the flu and COVID.
[35] So essentially, even after looking at five trials with different masks, it really didn't matter what kind of mask it was.
[36] The study showed they were not effective in stopping.
[37] the spread.
[38] And in fact, it concluded that wearing them probably makes little or no difference.
[39] And that's a direct quote.
[40] Okay, so little to no difference.
[41] I've seen some reporting out there that claims that, you know, while the Cochrane Review is enormously respected, this particular study was flawed.
[42] Yeah, I noted that same thing.
[43] And one of the big claims that you're tending to see in all those stories is that the study only tested the efficacy of masks for mask wearers, not for the people around them.
[44] But I asked Dr. Bottagaria about that, and he told me that it is flat out false.
[45] The review did include some studies on that.
[46] And in particular, he pointed to one that studied people who were living in very close quarters in tents while traveling to Mecca.
[47] So in that case, the researchers had some people wear masks and tested others who didn't.
[48] It still didn't find any mask effectiveness.
[49] Now, previous Cochran reviews on the efficacy of masks were also skeptical about their effectiveness.
[50] But they weren't nearly as clear.
[51] And the lead author, Dr. Tom Jefferson of the University of Oxford, says that's because Cochran was facing political pressure to water down their results.
[52] So Jefferson says Cochran initially delayed the publication of his review in 2020 by seven months and that they then tempered the findings out of fear of reprisal because that review didn't offer the quote right answer.
[53] And Jefferson said that delay, and I'm going to just quote this verbatim.
[54] Just happened to coincide with the time when all the craziness began, when academics and politicians started jumping up and down about masks.
[55] We call them strident campaigners.
[56] They are activists, not scientists.
[57] Quite a strong statement there from Jefferson.
[58] What about all the costs of mask mandates, whether financial and social or educational?
[59] Right.
[60] I mean, that has been the big pushback all along from all of those who argued that government officials imposed mandates without the proper evidence that masking was actually effective.
[61] And the studies on those costs that you mentioned, John, are just now starting to come in.
[62] And we do see now that it looks like child development and education to name just a couple of key factors were indeed negatively impacted, perhaps dramatically.
[63] Thanks, Megan.
[64] Yeah, anytime.
[65] That was Daily Wire Culture Reporter, Megan Basham.
[66] An FBI memo leaked this week by a whistleblower revealed the agency's potential targeting of so -called radical traditional Catholics associating the group with racially motivated violent extremism.
[67] Here to discuss the troubling memo and the FBI's response is Daily Wire Reporter Amanda Prestizakamo.
[68] Hey Amanda.
[69] First, tell us more about this document.
[70] Why would the FBI specifically target this group of religious people?
[71] Hey, John.
[72] Yeah, so the memo dated January 23rd is from the FBI's Richmond office.
[73] It was reportedly reviewed and approved for release by the office's top lawyer.
[74] It basically warns agents that these so -called radical traditional Catholics who prefer the Latin Mass could be associated with racially and ethnically motivated violent extremism.
[75] It also ties these supposed radicals to a quote, adherence to anti -Semitic, anti -immigrant, anti -LGBQ, and white supremacist ideology.
[76] The memo focuses on new mitigation opportunities for the feds by way of recruiting sources from within the Catholic Church, stating that agents will, and I'm quoting here, continue to attempt to connect with radical traditional Catholic adherence, both virtually via social media and in -person at places of worship.
[77] Now, a controversial so -called hate watchdog played a role here, correct?
[78] Yeah, it appears so.
[79] The FBI memo cites the Southern Poverty Law Center.
[80] The SPLC claims to monitor hate nationwide, but in recent years, the group has really shown itself to have clear bias against conservatives and Christians.
[81] even the Washington Post has openly questioned the group's fairness.
[82] The document also had citations from Left Wing Outlet Salon and an article from the Atlantic, which also leans left, trying to tie rosary beads to extremism.
[83] And for some reason, the Latin Mass is cited.
[84] Yeah, there's a pretty healthy Latin Mass movement here, though it represents just a fraction of masses performed at the around 17 ,000 Catholic parishes in the States.
[85] One Latin Mass directory showed 577 venues that hold these traditional masses within the U .S. Pope Francis has really cracked down on these Latin masses, claiming they hurt the unity of the church.
[86] And there's been an effort, largely in left -wing media, to paint these participants as radical, seemingly because they generally hold more traditional values and conservative views.
[87] Okay.
[88] What do we know about the leak and the former agent who brought this to the public?
[89] Well, recently suspended FBI agent, Serafin, exposed the memo this past week, and it was first reported by Uncover D .C. Serafin still has a lot of ties to the FBI and said someone from within the agency, who is not Catholic, by the way, brought this to him concerned about the FBI's reach.
[90] Now, Serafin was an agent for six years.
[91] He worked in numerous field offices in the counterterrorism division and helped conduct investigations of suspected domestic extremism and white supremacist.
[92] plots.
[93] So he has a good deal of knowledge about the inner workings of the FBI.
[94] He told Fox News.
[95] He believes the memo shows the Bureau's intent to start targeting other Christians, not just these traditional Catholic Christians.
[96] They are so desperate to find white supremacists that they're going to look at the Catholic Church.
[97] But I think if we're realistic about it, what they're doing is they have found a gateway in what they think is fringe Catholicism in order to move into Christians in general and declare them to be the criminals in this country or the potential terrorists.
[98] Now, the FBI has responded.
[99] What was their response to this leak of the memo?
[100] Yeah, they did respond.
[101] They've now publicly disavowed it, admitting that it was a circulated official memo.
[102] The Bureau now says it does not meet their exacting standards.
[103] Here's a key part of that statement.
[104] Quote, this particular field office product disseminated only within the FBI regarding racially or ethnically motivated violent extremism does not meet the exacting standards of the FBI.
[105] The FBI went on to insist that they will never conduct investigative activities or open an investigation based solely on First Amendment protected activity.
[106] Well, certainly noteworthy that they actually confirmed the memo.
[107] Amanda, thanks for reporting.
[108] Yeah, anytime.
[109] That was Daily Wire reporter Amanda Presta Giacomo.
[110] The theater chain AMC recently unveiled a new tiered pricing model that would charge more for prime seats and offer discounts for the front row.
[111] The move was blasted by critics as rewarding the rich and putting it.
[112] the poor.
[113] Joining us to discuss is Hollywood reporter and editor of Hollywood in Toto, Christian Toto.
[114] Christian, thanks for coming on.
[115] Now, there was a big controversy this past week about AMC theaters and their new pricing structure.
[116] How are the prices changing and why was it so controversial?
[117] Well, for years and years, you would pay a certain price and you'd go to the theater and you'd basically pick any seat you want to sit in for that movie.
[118] But now it's going to be a little different with AMC theaters, at least starting later this year.
[119] you're going to pay a certain price, and that'll mean you'll be in a certain section of the theater.
[120] So if you want to pay a premium, you get the best seats in the house.
[121] So I think any time as there's change at that significance, there's a controversy.
[122] So some people were outraged by it, a lot of anger on social media, and some of the reporting on it has been a little bit snarky.
[123] And I think that's a sign that, hey, maybe not everyone's going to be on board with this change.
[124] Now, there were a few celebrities that spoke out about this, And they seem to suggest that this was a class issue.
[125] Can you tell us about that?
[126] Yeah, I think the biggest star to really complain about the whole situation was Elijah Wood.
[127] Of course, we know him best from the Lord of the Rings trilogy.
[128] And he said exactly that.
[129] This is going to be better for people who are well off and worse for people who are just kind of living paycheck to paycheck.
[130] He said, you know, there's a real popular streak when it comes to the movies.
[131] You pay a ticket.
[132] You sit anywhere you want.
[133] You could have the best seat in the house if you want if you get there early.
[134] That will change with this new plan.
[135] And I think that's what he was addressing.
[136] And I think he really hit a nerve with it as well.
[137] How much of a difference in the price will there be between the good seats and the front row seats?
[138] I don't believe so.
[139] Some media outlets are reporting $1 to $2 more.
[140] So that's not a significant fee.
[141] But, you know, the economy is struggling right now.
[142] And sometimes people say, well, you know, maybe theaters is one area where I can kind it back.
[143] Now, I personally really enjoy theaters.
[144] But the past few times that I've gone, I've sensed that they are struggling.
[145] What are the long -term trends for theaters?
[146] I think you're seeing people shying away from theaters more and more.
[147] Honestly, I've talked to a lot of people over the years, and the one thing they say consistently to me is, I just don't go to the movies that much anymore, at least not as much as I used to.
[148] And that was before the pandemic.
[149] Another factor here that people don't talk about enough is that a lot of movies that are fairly new and even successful on the big screen are going to video -on -demand services pretty early.
[150] The recent hit Megan, which is a successful horror movie, Just a few weeks after it opened in theaters, you could pay for it at home via different video -on -demand -demand services.
[151] So I think with that in play, more and more people will say, gosh, I'd like to see that movie, but I'm just going to wait a week or two and then see it at home.
[152] Now, do you anticipate that this is going to bring more people to the movies once they're a little bit cheaper or if there's a cheaper option?
[153] I don't think this is going to have a positive effect on the industry, honestly.
[154] I think some people may stay away.
[155] I think others may think I don't want to pay an extra surcharge movie price is already very expensive.
[156] And I think it's going to be a bit of a confusing model because not every theater is going to have this system in place.
[157] You know, regal cinemas doesn't have it at the moment.
[158] Some independent movie houses are not going to use this model.
[159] So I think it's going to cause more confusion than anything else.
[160] And also, you know, if you pay extra to see a movie and it's a clunker, you might be even madder at the whole process.
[161] All right.
[162] Well, Christian, thanks so much for reporting.
[163] Thank you.
[164] That was Daily Wire Hollywood correspondent, Christian Toto.
[165] another story we're tracking this week.
[166] The CDC has now added COVID vaccines to its routine immunization schedule for both children and adults.
[167] The public health agency now recommends that children between six months and 15 months old receive a two -dose or three -dose primary series and booster.
[168] The CDC is recommending a three -dose series for children who are, quote, moderately or severely immunocompromised.
[169] Thanks for listening to Morning Wire.
[170] We created this show to bring more balance to the national conversation.
[171] If you love our show and you stand with our mission, please consider subscribing, leaving us a five -star rating, and most importantly, sharing our podcast with a friend.
[172] Well, that's all the time we've got this morning.
[173] Thanks for waking up with us.
[174] We'll be back this afternoon with more of the news you need to know.